And here we are again. What we’ve got to remember is that her Maj is something of an anomaly. When folk spend their lives steeped in privilege, told that they have inherent rights to power based on their emergence from the correct sets of genitals, how much can we blame them for believing it? At what point do we have to recognise our own culpability in a system that has just as much a chance of throwing up an Andrew, or indeed a Charles (don’t waste your time trying to convince me he’s some kind of prize – adulterer, accepter of funds from murderous regimes), as it does of producing a Liz.
Then again, as devoted and dedicated as the Queen has undoubtedly been over the course of her quite considerable reign, can we really say that she’s earned it? But this isn’t about the general redundancy of the monarchy in a modern democratic (and we’ve spent far too much time already moaning about the broken system we’re toiling under, meaning that a minority of the electorate has had an outsized say in those who govern over us) system. It’s about the boy who’s been told he would be king for far too long getting rather too big for his boots. I know they’re a national symbol (which in and of itself is rather laughable and a throwback to a bloodier, more possessive era) and the women’s team are doing very well indeed, but importing a load of lionesses for the sake of a charity fundraiser does seem like something of an abuse of power.
Maybe I’ve just picked this one because I’m sick of talking about the leadership race already (reason number seventy four that I’m unlikely to kick off a stellar career as a political journalist anytime soon). It’s definitely got nothing to do with an unhealthy obsession with royalty. Absolutely not. But maybe this is pointing towards a future where we don’t have to bother with the Windsors any more.